Personal tools
You are here: Home ›› Blog and Discussion ›› Waiting for the Backlash

Waiting for the Backlash

Posted by Kalpana Krishnamurthy at Nov 05, 2009 12:10 PM |

In the analysis of what went wrong in the fight over marriage equality in Maine, who will get blamed? Read more about race, LGBTQ equality, and ballot measure fights.

Waiting for the Backlash

Kalpana

Let me first admit, it's taken me a day to recover. The loss in Maine on Question 1 is painful to me; I had hoped that New England would become a bastion of support for marriage equality. I also hoped that we would win our first ballot based victory on same sex marriage. Doing so in Maine would have given me hope that it's possible here in our region, which is also dominated by a ballot measure process that's been used as a weapon against the LGBTQ community. But Maine might offer some hope, right? 

... the second I heard we lost, I began to wait for the inevitable backlash. The naming and blaming of communities. The "whose fault is it" that we lost.

So the loss is big for me. And it got me thinking. Because the second I heard we lost, I began to wait for the inevitable backlash. The naming and blaming of communities. The "whose fault is it" that we lost.

Why, you ask? Because the fallout from Prop 8 in California was horrific. Within hours of the polls closing, we were hearing armchair analysis from pollsters, California power players, and (my personal favorite) sex columnist Dan Savage that blamed California's communities of color. The same group that had helped to elect Barack Obama was blamed for its homophobia and accused of not standing for social justice and for ruining the progressive movement's moment in the sun.

And the sad reality is that most people believed the hype. We believed it because it plays into our cultural stereotypes that people of color are more homophobic, more religious, and more willing to stand for a person of color (Barack) than for the gay community.

Now we have Maine rejecting marriage equality. The results in Maine, a state that is 95.3% white, make it clear that we can't blame the people of color who live there. So who do we blame? My hunch is that rural white voters are on the hook. But the blame placed on rural white voters will be very different in its tenor and tone than Prop 8.  

...rural white voters in Maine will not be blamed for their whiteness...

Blaming rural white voters for their perceived conservatism, religiosity, and class difference will inevitably occur as we look at what happened to Question 1 in Maine.  But how we as progressives deal with it will be interesting to watch -- because rural white voters in Maine will not be blamed for their whiteness, they will not be called out for abandoning a civil rights struggle, and they will not be accused of prioritizing their whiteness over their straightness. All of which happened in the analysis of the Prop 8 fight.

I think the post election analysis is important - it helps us figure out what happened, what messages worked, what techniques for engagement worked. But too often, the story that gets told in the first few days only reinforces our beliefs about voters, reveals a thin racial justice analysis, and is incredibly difficult to change once it's out in public.

Check out Gay Marriage Split: Why Maine is Mainstream

Maine vote on gay marriage

Posted by Launce at Nov 05, 2009 04:01 PM
Thank you, as always, Kalpana, for your thoughtful contribution to the discussion over what worked - and what didn't - and why in this week's elections. I too am heartbroken over the vote in Maine, but I am strengthened by the votes in Washington. A lot of armcharriors (ha!) are focusing on the gubernatorial votes in VA and NJ, but I think the initiatives - and the vote in NY-23 congressional race - might be better indicators of where we're going as a nation. (Certainly a better indicator of where at least one political party is going.)

Democracy Vs. Democracy

Posted by Brad Hoover at Nov 10, 2009 12:36 PM
In reagrds to Civil Rights legislation in Washington State & Main (and also California) we are seeing two very distinct styles of Democracy in action.
**Mob Rule Democracy***
This is the kind of democracy that says 'majority rule...might makes right.' At first glance is appears legitimate because it occurs within the context of a vote by the people. But just because the Mob has spoken doesnt make the mob right. Mobs are manifestations of anger & fear and are destructive. Hardly the foundation for any law worthy of or Constitution. Mob Rule Democracy was never able to stop things like, slavery, segreation, executvie order 9066, denying women the right to vote & so on...

**Democracy that aspires to the values of our Declaration of Independence & Constitution, which does not bend to the will of the mob, or dogma, or fear. This kind of Democracy walks the talk That we are indeed created equal.

Facebook Like Box
 
powered by Plone | site by Groundwire and served with clean energy