Link to Home Page
Link to Program Info Link to Resources Link to Archives Link to Links Page Join Western States Center

 

The Center's Research and Action for Change and Equity (RACE) Program supports research, education and action on race-related issues at the community level. It includes a dismantling racism training program; issue education and strategic convening of allied organizations working towards racial justice; and focused organizational development within communities of color.

Part of Western States' RACE (Research and Action for Change and Equity) Program, the Dismantling Racism Project is one strategy intended to increase the breadth and depth of racial justice work in the region through supporting organizations to build a shared analysis of race and racism. The Dismantling Racism Project strengthens the capacity of individuals and organizations doing racial justice work in the West by developing Dismantling Racism trainers; providing training and support to organizations, coalitions and individuals; and creating educational materials.


RACE Writing:
Leah Henry-Tanner and Chuck Tanner on Tribal Sovereignty
Kayse Jama on the word 'refugee'
Tarso Luís Ramos on regional organizing

Western States Center Board member, Leah Henry-Tanner and Chuck Tanner recently released a report on Tribal Sovereignty and efforts to limit sovereignty. With useful strategies for combating these efforts, this report, Living Like Neighbors, is a useful, even necessary, tool for anti-racist organizations and allies.


"Refugee" - A Pejorative Word?
by Kayse Jama, New Voices Fellow, Western States Center

Following Hurricane Katrina, many of us were dismayed by the social conditions that the natural disaster revealed. While New Orleans residents were struggling for survival, Americans suddenly found themselves debating the meaning of a word that often seems far away, foreign or distant: refugee.

The media's use of the word refugee stirred anger among African Americans. They argued that "refugee" implies that the displaced storm victims, many of whom are Black, are second-class citizens - or not even Americans. "It is racist to call American citizens refugees," the Rev. Jesse Jackson said, during a visit to the Houston Astrodome, and members of the Congressional Black Caucus expressed similar sentiments.

Having left my home country of Somalia as a refugee, I too found myself asking what the word meant. According to the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), a refugee is a person who "owing to a well-founded fear of being persecuted for reasons of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group, or political opinion, is outside the country of his nationality, and is unable to or, owing to such fear, is unwilling to avail himself of the protection of that country..." (<http://www.unhcr.ch/>http://www.unhcr.ch).

America accepts close to one hundred thousand refugees from around the world every year, and--globally speaking--there are more than 14 million refugees. In addition, there are millions more that are internally displaced, either by war or human made conditions such as economic displacement.

This is where the debate over the word "refugee" gets tricky.

African Americans and many people of color in the US struggle with social conditions created by a system rooted deep within the soil-- a system of social and economic injustice that has been practiced for hundreds of years. African Americans were enslaved to build America without being able to benefit from their backbreaking work. Through the recent history of the Civil Rights struggle, African Americans have achieved significant victories on the road to true civil rights. Yet, Katrina brought to light the ugly reality of modern day racial oppression.

African-Americans in New Orleans were escaping natural disaster. But how would the impact of this natural disaster change if racism and economic injustice were not factors? If we do consider the pervasive racism and economic injustice experienced by flood evacuees, would New Orleanians then qualify for refugee status under the UNHCR definition? How do actual refugees (like me) feel about this discussion? Do they feel further isolated from American culture, civic life, and confirmed in their feeling like "second-class citizens" (though many aren't citizens, at least not yet)? Does refugee have to be a dirty word?

Perhaps America needs to rethink the way it treats refugees--these seemingly invisible foreigners seeking asylum on our shores--as well as the way it treats historically oppressed people, such as African Americans. As the debate continues, many agree that because the word refugee has recently been used to imply derogatory social status, it is very insensitive to use in the case of Katrina survivors. In the meantime, it is important to make sure that above questions are indeed not forgotten.


 

The article below was recently published in the National Organizing Alliance's publication, The Ark, which graciously granted permission for its republication here.


RACING THE NORTHWEST:

The Organizing Challenge in a Changing Region

By Tarso Luís Ramos, Western States Center

This article was originally published in the National Organizers' Alliance magazine, The Ark, and is republished here with their permission.

When most people speak of race the "West," they're usually referring to California or the Southwest. But the West includes more than land grabbed from Mexico; there's also the Northwest, an area that includes inland states as well as Washington and Oregon.

It's an area that usually figures outside discussions on race. There is a widely held perception both within and outside the Northwest that, as one of the whitest parts of the country (about 16% people of color overall), racial justice issues here are somehow less pressing. My experience living and working in the region for the last 17 years is that just the opposite is true.

Whether it's hate group activity (the Northwest has long been hailed as a "white homeland" by the far right); police violence (the Portland, Oregon, Police Department uses deadly force at a higher rate than the NYPD); gentrification and displacement (Seattle's last black neighborhood is in the final stages of colonization; or a host of other issues, race looms large in the Northwest. The need for racial justice organizing is especially intense here precisely because communities of color are smaller, diverse, isolated from each other and more effectively marginalized by the dominant community.

The Great White North(west)

The Northwest is known for its live and let live ethos and the Pacific Northwest—Oregon and Washington—has long been considered a liberal stronghold. But consider this: bigots and white supremacists from this region head not only for the hills but also to the HillCapitol, that is. Washington's Jack Metcalf led the anti-Indian movement as an activist, state legislator and, ultimately, a federal Representative. His contemporary, Sen. Slade Gorton (R-Wash.) fought tribal treaty rights as state Attorney General and then used his Senate position to propose that Congress eliminate tribal sovereignty altogether.

Idaho's infamous former U.S. representative, Helen Chenoweth, courted militia groups and defended the racist hiring practices of local Forest Service offices by declaring that "the warm-climate community (i.e. Latinos and African-Americans) just hasn't found the colder climate that attractive." Even "liberal" politicians can be found championing racist causes. Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) recently joined with his Republican counterpart, Sen. Gordon Smith, in attempting to revive a farm labor system denounced by one of its former administrators as a form of "legalized slavery." And, as many organizers will point out, our elected bigots are even more colorful at the state and local levels.

The Northwest's conservative racial politics and white electoral supermajorities have made the region attractive to right-wing groups seeking to mainstream their racist agendas. A decade of Christian Right campaigns against "special rights" (i.e. civil rights protections) for lesbian/gay/bisexual and transgendered (LGBT) people helped soften the ground for a more recent round of racialized attacks. In just the past four years English-only ballot initiatives were passed in Alaska and Utah; Washington voters repealed state-based affirmative action programs, perceived by many as "special rights" for black people; and state legislatures across the region have offered up a barrage of racist bills, from attacks on bilingual education to English-only laws.

Idaho, Oregon and Washington are among the fastest growing states in the country and most of that population growth represents migration from other U.S. cities. In the 1990s, high-tech industries drove a booming economy and high-wage jobs at the likes of Microsoft, Intel and Hewlett-Packard have many thousands to what became known as the Silicon Forest. The "quality of life" here—natural beauty, recreational opportunities, "livable" cities, and, it seems, whiteness—is also a significant pull factor for businesses and people fleeing big cities (especially in California) with large and growing communities of color.

It must come as a disturbing surprise to many of these new arrivals that the Great White Northwest looks increasingly like the places they fled. While it will be a long time before people of color are a majority in Washington (never mind Wyoming), communities of color overall are outpacing white growth by about five to one. Across the region, Latin@s are the fastest growing racial group; in Oregon, the community expanded by 140% in just the last decade. The African-American and Native communities are generally holding steady and, especially in the Pacific Northwest, the Asian population (particularly Southeast Asian) is rapidly increasing. By 2025 people of color will make up about 25% of the region's population, as compared to 16% in 2000.

Race in the Region

After leading the successful campaign to dismantle affirmative action in California, businessman Ward Connerly supported a second such effort in Washington. Of any state in the Northwest, Washington would seem the most likely to reject such cynical race baiting.  Washington has among the largest populations of color in the region (above 20%) and a history of electing people of color to prominent positions.  Norm Rice, an African-American, was elected mayor of Seattle, King County Executive Ron Sims is also black, and Chinese-American Governor Gary Locke now in his second term. Still, the 1998 anti-affirmative action campaign passed 60/40 at the ballot box.

While this was an electoral campaign, it surfaced many of the chronic challenges racial justice organizers face in the Northwest. These include:

Despite the difficulties, racial justice organizers in the Northwest are fighting and winning important victories. I spoke with organizers from several states and communities about how the racial realities of the region have shaped their approaches to making change in the Northwest.

Against White SupremacyUp South

If the rest of the country and the world thinks about racial justice struggles in the Northwest, chances are they think of white supremacists: Aryan Nations, Militia of Montana, Posse Comitatus, the Order, neo-Nazi skinheads, and various anti-Indian groups. Loretta Ross, who for many years organized against the Klan and other bigots down South with the Center for Democratic Renewal, only half-jokingly refers to the Northwest as up South.  But unlike the South, whites in the Northwest have never been made to answer for white supremacy, which has reigned here since the end of the Indian Wars.

As director of the Seattle-based Northwest Coalition for Human Dignity, Eric Ward fights organized bigots in a six-state region that stretches from Washington to Wyoming. Ward was trained by human rights organizers who cut their teeth in the South, but the racial realities of the Northwest have given rise to a different organizing approach.

"In the South there's a large black community that would be sympathetic to taking on the Klan. That doesn't exist here in the Northwest," says Ward. "And so you have to engage a constituency that, because of white privilege and societal bigotry, doesn't often see its interest in taking on the white nationalist movement." (White nationalism is a social movement whose members believe the U.S. is a white nation but that whites have lost control of the state. While some are members of white supremacist groups, the majority are not.)

The Coalition has built a network of local human rights groups that: provide support to hate crime victims; pressure local school boards to adopt culturally relevant curricula; maneuver to block white nationalist efforts at mainstreaming themselves; and work on issues ranging from attacks on abortion clinics to anti-immigrant organizing. "While people of color are ultimately affected most by the growth of the white nationalist movement, it's middle class whites who are being recruited. We're out here competing for this same constituency," said Ward.

Since its founding in 1987, the Coalition has evolved into something uncommon: a people-of-color-run group that organizes rural whites. Ward and other racial justice organizers note the importance of whites learning to take leadership from people of color, particularly on issues of race. Challenging anywhere, this work takes on a particular character in rural towns in states like Wyoming and Idaho. "We're often interacting with people who have never dealt with a person of color in a leadership position," Ward says. "Some have never met a person of color. We deal with what I'd call common, normalized racism and stereotypes all the time." But, says Ward, the real challenge comes from, "larger, well-resourced organizations that are simply not as supportive of people of color leading a large white constituency as they are of white people leading large people-of-color constituencies."

Ward concedes that people of color in this country are more likely to die as a result of institutionalized racism than at the hands of violent bigots. "So, as people of color organizers, we tend to believe that it's not a priority to fight white nationalism and we tend to let white people off the hook for this work, as well."

But in dismissing the movement as marginal "extremists" we overlook its influence on mainstreamed, institutionalized racism. After all, it's a short walk from David Duke's 1980s attacks on affirmative action as "reverse discrimination" to the current mainstream attacks. He asks, "If we believe that our progressive social movements can fundamentally restructure society, why would we think that reactionary social movements cannot?"

Enlarging Indian Country

This whole region was once Indian Country. Five hundred years after colonization began, Native Americans struggle to shed an invisibility that aids and abets continuing genocide. "It's a little bit better in Montana," says Indian People's Action director Janet Robideau, "because the Indian vote is significant." Montana's population is about 8% Native American and there are seven reservations spread across the state.  Tribal governments have won a certain level of political clout, but the half of Montana's Indians who live off-reservation have had no organized voice for their communities.

"Everyone assumed that our issues were on sovereignty and fishing and water," explains Robideau, who organizes urban Indians in Montana. "It's not that we don't care about those things—we care deeply about whether our people remain as sovereign nations. But we're also trying to deal with the fact that our kids are getting kicked out of the school system and harassed by law enforcement, and we can't get jobs."

Northern Cheyenne and Sioux, Robideau grew up on the Northern Cheyenne Reservation amidst vicious racism. She recalls signs in local stores that read "No Dogs and No Indians Allowed," and an incident where white parents pelted her school bus with eggs and tomatoes after a basketball game, "because our team was good." "These days most people aren't quite as blatant," she says. "But people who don't dare say anything to an African-American, Asian or Latina feel quite comfortable saying those types of things to Native Americans."

In 1992, Robideau was organizing nursing homes for the Montana Coalition for Nursing Home Reform. When they stalled in negotiations, the coalition brought the Reverend Jesse Jackson to town for a rally that attracted a big Montana crowd (2000) including hundreds of Indian People from Missoula. "I was amazed," Robideau said. "I thought there were maybe thirty of us who lived here! I found out that there were actually closer to 1800 at the time. When I saw all those Indian people at the rally, I thought 'We have to unite our voice.'"

Robideau set out to do just that, but had trouble raising money for the project. Having seen a number of Indian groups start up only to flounder and disappear a year later, she was cautious. She took a job with Montana People's Action, a predominantly white statewide community group organizing low-and moderate-income residents on such issues as health access and living wages. There, Robideau proposed organizing an urban Indian chapter, got the green light in 1996 and spent a full year lining up funding. Indian People's Action (IPA) started up the following year.

IPA was established as a direct-action organization committed to leadership development in the context of issue campaigns. Its mission is to "address the issues of institutionalized racism and change those by setting policies that are going to ensure fair and equitable treatment of Indian people." Says Robideau, "We need to change those systems that set our people up to fail." The group draws members from all across the vast state, keeping her on the road a good deal of the time.

Urban Indians weren't sure what to make of Robideau's organizing at first. Accustomed to being courted for their votes, many assumed that was her motive and would ask, "Is it election time again?" Culturally, the most difficult part of direct action organizing in Indian Country has been the issue of dues. "I would go to a house and visit and talk about IPA and how we together can change things, and that the organization needed to be supported, and people often took offense," remembers Robideau. "In our culture, it was the equivalent of offering to help someone, and then asking them for payment."

Ultimately, what got new members over that hurdle was IPA's campaign on racism in public schools. "I'd tell people, 'Look, our grandparents went through this; our parents went through this; we went through this; our children are going through this in the public school system and if we don't change it our grandchildren will experience it. That," she says, "is what really resonated with members, so they were willing to pay the dues."

Of the many problems Indians face in schools is denial of their very existence. "We had kids graduating from school who didn't know that there are seven reservations and thirteen tribes in the state," says Robideau. IPA joined with other groups to craft the Indian Education for All Act. "Our portion of that says that public education curriculum will be culturally relevant, include Montana's Indian history and be taught by culturally competent instructors." With lots of hard work, the Act passed in 1999.

The organization has branched out into other problem areas such as job discrimination and police harassment. In 2000, IPA ran a campaign against racial profiling by the Missoula police department. Robideau recounts that youth were targeted by police as gang members because of their clothes and for daring to congregate in public and that driving while Indian was treated like a moving violation. IPA turned out 100 Indians for an accountability session with the Missoula chief of police and pressed a series of demands. "From that," says Robideau, "they now have a mandatory dismantling racism training program for all law enforcement and emergency personnel that we designed and is Native American-specific."

Despite the group's name, there are white members of IPA. "Our very first members realized that if we were an Indians-only group, sooner or later that would work against us," says Robideau. "Besides, we also wanted to build bridges of understanding. A white person could say the exact same thing as me to a white audience and somehow it would take hold where I wouldn't be heard. We understood that and said the goal is to have more people understand what we endure and help us change it.  But a lot of times where there are white people involved in organizations like ours, they do the speaking and the Indian people are in the background.  So IPA has a hard-and-fast rule that only Indian people will speak publicly for the organization."

Robideau says this arrangement has been successful, and that the rare threat of division within the base has been between tribes. "One of the greatest tragedies for us as people of color is that we allow outsiders to come in and agitate us and turn us against each other," she says. Asked whether IPA has built relationships with other communities of color in the state, Robideau points out that Indians and whites account for 98.7% of Montana's population. There are small communities scattered around—Latin@s in Billings, African-Americans in Great Falls and Hmong in Missoula. Amazingly, Robideau says, "We have people who say, 'Why is all the attention going to the Hmong community? You pay more attention to the Hmong than you do to me!' That's divide-and-conquer and we add to it when we allow people to turn us against each other."

Looking back on IPA's accomplishments in its first five years, Robideau notes that before IPA, "there was no urban Indian voice. Everybody knew where the tribes stood on issues but nobody even recognized us as being part of the community as Indian people, or that we had issues." She adds, "What's really changed in terms of the climate in Montana is that we're organizing. Indian people are saying 'we have lived with this for generations and it's time that it changed.'"

Robideau recounts the conversations she had as a child with her grandfather, Alec Blackhorse, about racism. "I would say, 'Why do these people do that? We need to fight back.' And he said, 'No. You have to feel sorry for them. They don't know any better. You have to say a prayer for them.' So I took what he said for years and then I said, 'OK, I'm going to pray for them. And then I'm going to kick the crap out of them! I'm tired of this!'"

Part Two

 

 

 

© 2005, Western States Center